Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/67134
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhan Tuan Lyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T06:43:31Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-10T06:43:31Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/67134-
dc.description.abstractThere have been a lot of materials in teaching legal English in recent years. In the context of applying precedents as a source of law in Vietnamese legal framework, the precedents of the countries where English is a first language also become a meaningful resource for teaching legal English. Legal discourses have their own features and obligation-describing linguistic characteristics are one of the most featured of them. In the light of Systemic Functional Grammar, this paper describes the obligatory features of precedents by the modulation analysis with qualitative methods. Investigating 1,164 sentences of two precedents which were presented on 94 pages of A4 size paper, the result showed that the proportion of sentences containing modulation elements in the UK precedents was scanty. It could be concluded that that feature was a characteristic of the English precedent's modulation. In addition, obligatory characteristic was not a featured one of all legal discourses. Based on the analysis of the modulation system of the United Kingdom precedents, we made some recommendations for the teaching of legal English related to the modulation system and the precedents as useful legal materials.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUEH Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Proceedings of the second international conference on Applied Linguistics and Language Education 2022: Reconnecting and Thriving in the new normalen_US
dc.subjectModulationen_US
dc.subjectSystemic Functional Grammaren_US
dc.subjectModulation of precedent discourseen_US
dc.subjectLegal Englishen_US
dc.titleAnalysing modulation of United Kingdom precedents from perspective of systemic functional grammar and some suggestions of legal English teachingen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.format.firstpage131en_US
dc.format.lastpage143en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextFull texts-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Paper-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers
Files in This Item:

File

Description

Size

Format

Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.