MENU
Login
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55241Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Su Dinh Thanh | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-14T11:02:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-09-14T11:02:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1859 -1124 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55241 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=813c1797-80d1-409f-99ba-4553e4b3ee07 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The effect of government relative size on economic growth is a contentious issue. This paper is undertaken to test the relationship between government size and economic growth in Vietnam. The study is a panel data investigation, involving 60 provinces over the period 1997–2012. Various measures of government size are defined: provincial government expenditure as a share of gross provincial product (GPP), provincial government revenue as a share of GPP, real provincial government expenditure per capita, and real provincial government revenue per capita. Empirical estimates are employed by conducting Difference Generalized Method of Moments method proposed by Arellano and Bond (1991) and Pooled Mean-Group method by Pesaran, et al. (1999). These tests reveal: (i) provincial government expenditure (revenue) as a share of GPP has a significantly negative effect on economic growth; and (ii) the real government expenditure (revenue) per capita has a significantly positive effect on economic growth. It is also found that the long-run and short-run coefficients of government expenditure size are significant and negative, that the correction mechanism from the short run disequilibrium to the long run equilibrium is not convergent, and that government employment has a negative correlation with economic growth. | - |
| dc.format | Portable Document Format (PDF) | - |
| dc.publisher | Trường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Economic Development | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | JED, No. 222 | - |
| dc.subject | Government size | - |
| dc.subject | Economic growth | - |
| dc.subject | GMM and PMG estimations | - |
| dc.title | Government Size and Economic Growth in Vietnam: A Panel Analysis | - |
| dc.type | Journal Article | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Altunc, O. F.& C. Aydın (2013), “The Relationship between Optimal Size of Government andEconomic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,92(0): 66-75. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Arellano, M.& S. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte CarloEvidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, Review of Economic Study, 58: 277 - 297. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Auteri, M.& M. Constantini (2004), “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: The Case ofthe Italian Regions”, The Review of RegionalStudies, 34(1): 72-94. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Barro, R. J.(1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 98:103-125. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Barro, R. J.(1991), “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 407-443. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Berry, W. D.& D. Lowery (1984), “The Measurement Size: Implication for the Study ofGovernment Growth”, The Journal ofPolitics, 46: 1193-1206. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Bleaney, M.& D. Greenaway (2001), “The Impact of Terms of Trade and Real Exchange Rateon Investment and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Journal of Development Economics, (65): 491-500. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Can, N. T.(2013), “Public Administration Reform in Vietnam: Current Situations andSolutions”, Scholarly Journal of BusinessAdministration, 3(5): 110-116. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Chen, S.T.& C.C. Lee (2005), “Government Size and Economic Growth in Taiwan: AThreshold Regression Approach”, Journalof Policy Modeling, 27(9): 1051-1066. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Dar, A. A.& S. AmirKhalkhali (2002), “Government Size, Factor Accumulation, andEconomic Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 24(7–8): 679-692. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Domazlicky, B.R. (1996), “Government Size and Regional Economic Growth: Another look”, The Review of Regional Studies, 26(1). | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Durden, G& B. Elledge (1993), “The Effects of Government Size on Economic Growth:Evidence from Gross State Product”, TheReview of Regional Studies, 23: 183-190. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Fleisher, B.,H. Li & M.Q. Zhao . (2010),“Human Capital, Economic Growth, and Regional Inequality in China”, Journal of Development Economics, 92(2):215-231. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Germmell, N.& J. Au (2012), “Government Size, Fiscal Policy and the Level and Growth ofOutput: A Review of Recent Evidence”, Working Paper in Public Finance (VictoriaUniversity of Wellington, New Zealand). | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Gwartney, J.,R.A. Lawson & R.G. Holcombe (1998), “The Size and Function of Governmentand Economic Growth”, Joint Economic Committee, Washington, DC, 20510,http://www.house.gov/jec/. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Harris, R. D.F. & E. Tzavalis (1999), “Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels Wherethe Time Dimension Is Fixed”, Journal ofEconometrics, 91: 201–226. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Hoàng ThịChinh Thon, Phan Thị Hương & Phạm Thị Thủy . (2010), “Tác động của chi tiêu công tới tăng trưởng kinh tế tạicác địa phương ở Việt Nam”, Trung tâm nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Chính sách, TrườngĐại học Kinh tế, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, 2010. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Kirchgässner,G. (2006), “On the Relation between Government Size and Economic Development:Some Methodological and Economic Remarks”, Swiss Institute for InternationalEconomic and Applied Economic Research (SIAW-HSG), CESifo and Leopodina. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Kneller, R.,M.F. Bleaney & N. Gemmell .(1999), “Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries”, Journal of Public Economics, 74:171-190. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Lucas, R. E.,Jr (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Mai Đình Lâm(2012), “Tác động phân cấp tài khóa đến tăng trưởng kinh tế tại Việt Nam”,unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Economics HCMC. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Mankiw, N. G.,D. Romer & D. N. Weil . (1992),“A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 407-437. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Martínez-López,D. (2005), “Fiscal Policy and Growth: The Case of Spanish Regions”, Economic Issues, 10(1): 9-24. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Nickell, S.(1981), “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects”, Econometrica, 49(6):1417-1426. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Niskanen,W.A., Jr. (1971), Bureaucracy andRepresentative Government, New York: Aldine-Atherton. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Pedroni, P.(1999), “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels withMultiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin ofEconomics and Statistics, (61): 653–670. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Pedroni, P.(2004), “Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of PooledTime Series Tests, with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis: New Results”, Econometric Theory, 20(3): 597-625. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Pesaran, M. H.,Y. Shin & R. P. Smith . (1999),“Pooled Mean Group Estimation and Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation, 94(446): 621-634. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Rebelo, S.(1991), “Long Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 99: 500-521. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Romer, P. M.(1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002-1037. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Roodman, D.(2009), “How to do xtabond2: An introduction to Difference and System GMM inStata”, The Stata Journal, 9(1):86-136. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Sahoo, P., R.K. Dash & G. Natarai (2010), “Infrastructure Development and EconomicGrowth in China”, Institute of Developing Economies, Discussion Paper No. 261. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Schaltegger,C. A. & B. Torgler (2004), “Growth Effects of Public Expenditure on theState and Local Level: Evidence from a Sample of Rich Governments”, Center forResearch in Economics, Management and the Arts, Working Paper No. 2004-16. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Stansel, D.(2005), “Local Decentralization and Local Economic Growth: A Cross-SectionalExamination of US Metropolitan Areas”, Journalof Urban Economics, 57(1): 55-72. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Vasavakul, T.,Lê Viết Thái & Lê Thị Phi Vân (2009), “Public Administration and EconomicDevelopment in Viet Nam: Remaking the Public Administration for the 21stCentury”, in J. Acuña-Alfaro (ed), ReformingPublic Administration in Vietnam: Current Situation and Recommendations,UNDP, Vietnam Fatherland Front and Centre for Community Support and DevelopmentStudies. The National Political Publishing House. Hà Nội. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Vedder, R. K.& L. E. Gallaway (1998), “Government Size and Economic Growth”, JointEconomic Committee, DC 20510. http://www.house.gov/jec/. | - |
| dc.relation.reference | Wu, S.Y. J. H.Tang & E. S. Lin (2010), “The Impact of Government Expenditure on EconomicGrowth: How Sensitive to the Level of Development?” Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6): 804-817. | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2014.222.03 | - |
| dc.format.firstpage | 17 | - |
| dc.format.lastpage | 39 | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.grantfulltext | none | - |
| item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
| item.fulltext | Only abstracts | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| Appears in Collections: | JABES in English | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.